There was a couple of good articles on the front page of the opinion section of yesterday's Boston Globe.
One, with the same title as this post, was about a book which questions the whole notion of "closure" as it exists, very imprecisely, in popular thought. I won't try to summarize it, but I think it's worth thinking about.
The other one is about the influence, even power, which "non-state actors" of various types have in the post Cold War world. Al Qaeda is just the most obvious example, but there are other types as well, such as Wikileaks, transnational corporations, and social networking sites. They can have impacts on countries that governments must be concerned about, but governments are finding the tools they can use with other governments (such as war, threats of war, foreign aid, etc.) are useless when the other party is not another country. The article points out the problem, but doesn't seem to point to any real solution(s).
Tanglewood — 2026/08/01-02
1 day ago
