Saturday, July 4, 2009

Fourth of July: An Alternative View

In the Boston Globe of Friday July 3, an opinion piece was published on the op-ed page in which the author presents an alternative view of the American Revolution.

Here's the opening prargraph. "MY EX-FATHER-IN-LAW is the only true conservative I’ve ever met. Why? Because he believes that the American Revolution was a mistake. That is, as a true believer in law and order, he abhors unlawful violence of any kind, even that used to overthrow unjust and oppressive governments." The whole thing is available through the link above.

Fun to think about. OTOH if the US hadn't been independent in the time of Jefferson, much of the continent might have remained in French and Spanish hands — which might or might not have been a good thing.

5 comments:

Tyler said...

ooo, i read the whole article. despite the fact that im not sure if he REALLY understands canada, i think i do like the author...

Doomed But Cheerful! said...

'... remained in French hands.'

The mind boggles!

G =]

Anonymous said...

Then California would be part of Mexico. :/ Or perhaps we'd be our own country? Wow, that does get one thinking...

naturgesetz said...

Thanks for the comments, guys.

I suspect the author of the piece was just thinking of the current U.S.A. as part of Canada. But it wouldn't necessarily have worked out that way.

Jason Carwin said...

interesting. I doubt that the French would have held on to the 'Louisiana Purchase' land. Remember, Jefferson approached Napoleon about buying only New Orleans, and Napoleon offered to sell all of his lands. He didn't want to be in America anymore.

Of course, had we remained under British rule, that land may have gone to the Spanish.