Tuesday, November 18, 2008

"Mike": A Friendship Destroyed

Readers will note that I'm not giving autobiographical items in chronological order. I post when I get the feeling that I need to post a certain item. Mark's thoughtful comment to the previous post has moved me to post this story of love in my life.

One afternoon I was taking my break in the company caf, reading some prayers from a prayerbook, when "Mike," a fairly new guy in the office, came and asked if he could join me. I said sure. He asked what the book was and I told him. He said he wasn't very religious. I said he should be: God is important. That's how it began.

He had been raised Catholic and still considered himself Catholic, but he didn't go to church or pray very much. He joined me at just about every break for many months, and we talked about our lives and about God and faith. I got him to agree to read St. Augustine's "Confessions" and we talked about that for a while. In warm weather, we'd walk outside at lunch. We talked about faith and about other things as well. He came to Mass with me a couple of times at a church in Boston, and reported going to Mass one Sunday when he was visiting an aunt in New York.

As time went on I found myself increasingly attracted to him, and I wanted to spend more time with him, so I suggested having dinner on a Friday after work. He agreed, and it became a fairly regular occurrence. Afterwards, he'd join his brother and their roommate for an evening at a bar, ostensibly to pick up girls, and I'd go home to the suburbs. That's what started the trouble, I think. He wanted things to be spur-of-the-moment. My mother and I were living together, and I felt I owed it to her to give her advance notice when I wouldn't be around for supper. So I'd press him to tell me if he would be free on Friday for dinner, and he'd want to keep it open. And I had really fallen in love with him. He may have sensed my deepening feelings and become uncomfortable.

Then he transferred to another office, still in Boston, but 1/2 mile or more away. That ended the breaks together and left only the Friday dinners. Instead of asking in person, I'd have to call, and he'd put off committing. Sometimes we'd end up going to dinner, occasionally not. But in order to make my plans, it seemed I'd have to keep calling, every evening. He started being busy when I called. He'd agree to a get together and then have something come up at the last minute. I was getting increasingly frustrated, and I kept calling.

One time when I called, he said he was busy. I asked when I should call. He said Thursday evening at 10:00. I called Thursday evening on the dot of 10:00 and got the answering machine message saying nobody was available. I knew the friendship was over, but, holding back tears I said it's naturgesetz calling as we had agreed. And of course, he never called back.

Some time later I was taking a mini course in counseling and I read in the textbook that it is a common pattern in all sorts of relationships — family, friendship, lovers, spouses — if one person distances him/herself from the other, and the second person tries to get closer again, the first one just keeps pulling farther and farther away until the relationship is broken. The only way to save the relationship is to let the person have his/her space. With luck, he/she eventually comes closer again; but if not, at least there is still something of the relationship left.

If only I had read that book earlier, I might not have completely ruined the friendship. Perhaps we could have stayed friends. Being in love with him made me even more desperate to hold on when I should have been giving him his space. I only hope that the way I made him uncomfortable in the relationship did not also sour him on the faith.

Several years after he broke off the relationship, I sent an announcement of an important event in my life, via his parents, whose address I had. I got a card that said "Congratulations" postmarked Minnesota. I haven't heard from him or about him for about 12 years now.
I hope he's okay.

Readers can draw their own conclusions. But it seems to me that my orientation and commitment to celibacy did not prevent me from developing a good friendship, which could have endured and been very satisfying if not for personality factors (and there were some on his side too) which were not just a matter of orientation.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for acknowledging me and telling your story natergesetz. It moved me.
We don't see eye to eye my friend. Given your frankness it would be unfair of me not to state my prejudice. I'm a 31 yo Australian gay guy living in London. I was raised in the Catholic faith but am now emphatically rejectionist of it. As much I decide to see your views as clouded by your passion for the christian world-view I have to concede that my own are, of course, perhaps equally clouded by my insistence on rejecting it. So make allowance for me.
You make of statements unequivocally which are far from unequivocal.
“God is important”
That very much depends on what “God” is. 2,000 years ago the folks that wrote the bible didn’t know, couldn’t (lets be fair on them) know the real majesty of the story they sought to tell. They didn’t know the ungraspeable majesty and vastness of the universe. They couldn’t know (and we can only barely grasp) the majesty of the beginning and what came of it. They couldn’t know (and we scrape at the surface) of the universe in us .. let alone the one outside.
I don’t reject God. We’re trying to comprehend something that is powerful and magical far beyond us. But i do reject the Christian faith. And for that matter, all other vanities at understanding. With respect, in the face of this majesty the Christian story is beneath infantile. In discussing morality it lends it virtue. But in purporting to tell us not only “how” but “why” it exposes its absurdity.
I won’t bombard your blog, but I wanted you to hear my dissenting view. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts ... not on reconciling chrisitianity with your life .. but on reconciling chrisianity with life itself.

naturgesetz said...

Mark —

Feel free to comment whenever you want.

"God is important." It seems to me that this is true if one believes that there is a God, no matter how one conceives of this God — the God of Christianity or something that is powerful and magical far beyond us. And I would agree with your characterization of God (even if "magical" is not exactly the word I'd have used). Whether it's the anthropomorphisms of scripture, John's statement, "God is love," all the works of St. Thomas Aquinas, or all of the above, we do not, cannot, have a complete description of a being so far above the universe and our intellectual capacities.

One basic question is whether this being we may call God is self-aware and acting purposively (a personal being) or some blind force operating automatically (an impersonal being). If the latter, Christianity would necessarily be false. If the former, can this God somehow touch the minds of people? Can he touch them to move them to do good? Can he touch them to know something about himself (revelation)?

If revelation is possible, it seems to me that Christianity could be the product of that revelation. I'm not sure I completely understand what you mean by "reconciling christianity with life itself." I am guessing that by "life itself" you mean the reality of our lived experience. I'd say that a revelation, if it is to have any purpose, must bring us somewhere in understanding or behavior where we wouldn't be without it. A revelation must give us some glimpse of understanding about the incomprehensible God that we couldn't figure out for ourselves, some inkling of the meaning and purpose of an existence that otherwise might seem absurd, or some insight into how we should live on this earth that would otherwise have been uncertain.

So to me, it is not an objection that Christianity tells us at times that we should not follow our inclinations. To me it is not an objection that Christianity tells us sometimes to restrain our impulses. If it's true, Christianity must sometimes tell us things that go against our grain.

If there can be no revelation, Christianity is nonsense. If there can be a revelation, it seems to me that Christianity could be it, and that it provides a better answer to the question of the universe, life, and all that than "42." The Christian answer being, "The love of God calling us into being and calling us beyond ourselves to life in him." But "42" reminds us that our understanding is always limited and incomplete. There have been times when Christians generally thought that not only did we have some answers, but that we had all the answers, neatly arranged, and tied up with a bow. But the truth is and always will be that with regard to God, "Now we see only reflections in a mirror, mere riddles, but then we shall be seeing face to face. Now, I can know only imperfectly; but then I shall know as I am known." — New Jerusalem Bible translation of 1 Corinthians 13:12

Anonymous said...

How very sad :(
I've had a similar thing happen to me with a very close friend who started to drift away and I pushed and she kept drifting away until it was just over.

I agree with you, I don't think your faith or orientation had anything to do with it, and from what you've said I certainly don't think that it was your fault or that you ruined it! You weren't to know that he needed space. Unfortunately life just works like this sometimes, people drift apart and small things get in the way and build up and there's not really much you can do about it.

I'm sorry that you lost a dear friend, I know it hurts and I know from experience that it is very hard to get over.

Anonymous said...

It is a sobering and sad lesson, this story. I'm very much sorry things didn't work out. I think it's important to remember, though, that sometimes when people push away, it's only to see if you're a good enough friend to come after them. Obviously, this wasn't one of those times. Still, I think it's less obviously "your fault" then you might want to make it. It's a situation that just went down bad, not through any meanness or concious wrongdoing on your part.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for your comment on my blog and for telling me to read about this time in your life.

I have a time in my life that was similar and its one of the things I plan on talking about at some point, I'll let you know when I post it.

Its also nice to know there is another gay catholic out there that I can receive advice from.

Doomed But Cheerful! said...

The point about allowing distance to open, and having courage enough to let it remain open, while the relationship adjusts itself is definitely worth noting.

While I do not agree with everything you write, I salute your candour and resolution.

Thank you for sharing this.

Servus.

Gurney

naturgesetz said...

Thanks for the comments,xthecouragex and Gurney.

One detail I didn't think to mention when I was writing the post is that during the time this was happening, Mike was in his mid to late 20's, and I was late 40's to early fifties.